On White Silence

One Mississippi, Two Mississippi, Three Mississippi…

The clock ticks on, and I am compelled to respond, nevertheless, to the silence of those white folks near to me in this moment of national upheaval and international importance. It is necessary to remind at the first that ‘white’ as a race is a fairly recent historical creation, and not a construct of a priori truth; rather it is a construct of political aim (and success), foisted on the world probably since the preparation and implementation of the Spanish Inquisition, and the subsequent colonizing of the ‘peripheral’ countries with black and brown populaces.

Read more

REVIEW: Ten Days That Shook The World

On the cover of the Haymarket edition (2019) which I read, it has, “A dazzling first-hand account of the Russian Revolution.” John Reed was on-assignment for a socialist/communist newspaper, The Masses, in St. Petersburg when Lenin, Trotsky, and the Bolsheviks attempted an insurrection, for power of the All-Russian Congress of the Soviets. Reed was present and, most times, in the very midst of these developments, and it was most certainly a dazzling, if not romantic, account of the events from November 7th to the 18th of the year 1917.

What struck me most throughout the book was the attitude of camaraderie displayed by the author, while still objectively describing, in his judgment, the faults of the Bolsheviki. There were no wholesale judgements, as they remained acutely contextualized. 

When recounting the storming of the Tsar’s Winter Palace, Reed details the tension among the workers and soldiers, as they finally grasped this symbol of the bourgeois and old regime. The riches in that palace could have served many peasants and their families for years to come, and yet when the Bolshevik leaders heard that ransacking was taking place, they paraded through the palace yelling, “Revolutionary discipline! These items belong to the People! Revolutionary discipline!”, and admonishing those who continued that they would face a tribunal for thieving, as the bourgeois did, from the people. It was an exhilarating example of self-determination among a people powered and virtually leaderless moment. The people took it upon themselves to lead, and admonish the selfishness that they were in attempt of revolutionizing.

On the contrary, most news of that night claimed that millions of rubles worth of items had been looted, with much violence and infighting. In reality, as Reed accounts, when cries of revolutionary discipline came ringing through the halls, nearly everyone dropped what they had presumed theirs in the heat of the revolutionary moment; they did this even though they had rationalized their thievery as self-appointed reparations. Further, anyone leaving was searched at the door for anything not belonging to them, no matter how little; and, no matter how big. Reed recounts a man walking the halls at one point with a standing clock over his shoulder, and when cries were heard he gingerly set it down where he stood, and went about other business.

Second what struck me were the procedures of the Bolshevik for instilling that sort of revolutionary discipline in both their physical and political insurrection. They detested reactionary-ism, where it led to wars and bad policy, and so they extolled political integrity. “No provocateurs!” And if one showed their hand as such, even a Bolsheviki, they would be thrown out. Misinformation was abound, and so they couldn’t do anything but have strict discipline against the provocation toward armed insurrection; Russian against Russian. The Bolsheviki were in fact the People in other terms, and the People did not want to kill each other, they wanted to retake their right of power from the bourgeoisie, for as Reed remarks on pages 305-6:

“Not by compromise with the propertied classes, or with the other political leaders; not by conciliating the old Government mechanism, did the Bolsheviki conquer power. Nor by the organized violence of a small clique. If the masses all over Russia had not been ready for insurrection it must have failed. The only reason for Bolshevik success lay in their accomplishing the vast and simple desires of the most profound strata of people, calling them to the work of tearing down and destroying the old, and afterward, in the smoke of falling ruins, cooperating with them to erect the framework of the new….”

Other calls to revolutionary self-control hit the same note of integrity as that night of storming the Winter Palace. As Reed narrates a proclamation from Lenin:

“‘Citizens! We [The Military Revolutionary Committee attached to the Petrograd Soviet of  Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies] call upon you to maintain complete quiet and self-possession. The cause of order and Revolution is in strong hands.”

It is these proclamations, and the conversations that birthed them, that so shook the world. The Soviets of Soldiers’, Peasants’, and Workers’ Deputies joined together to pronounce, as Lenin said on the eve of revolution: “Here is the power! What are you going to do with it?”

Letter to the Young Voter

There remains much discussion about when “the right time” to “talk politics” is. The conversation seems to be held from several positions: There are young people who find that the slow-moving nature of bureaucratic government is not worth the time it takes to get acquainted with the terms, ideas, and players involved in that government; there are entrenched pundits who incite that it is not the right time to talk about politics based on the current conversation’s allegiance to that speaker’s particular brand of punditry; there are liberal democrats who invoke the phrase as a way of blunting the political demand foisted on them by their constituency and the progressive wing of their party; and there are conservatives who invoke it whenever the conclusions therein clash with their solidly built and individualistic worldview.

Read more

Language for Reality Television

“…the selling of peoples’ inner lives for the vicarious living of anyone is a dystopian manifestation of capital in entertainment. The instantaneity of possessing information which came with the internet and social medias has fundamentally changed our perceptional goalposts for which informational bits we are lacking and thus owed until we possess them of others.”

Read more

Betelgeuse / Pulse / First Shock

Beau Tino always had his eyes pointed to the skies—further than mere sky—the stars; further still, alien galaxies innumerable. His Science Educator, Det James, took notice early on of Beau’s astronomical interest and gave him special attention in the form of testing-tidbits of information, demanding further research, and experiments in which to test that research. Often, they would find themselves “in study”, quite literally, out in the fields of their small planet, or on the highest modest hill within their horizon, just to observe the planetary neighbors, their satellites, and the stars of systems unknown.

Read more